Evidence Hub

Tobacco smoking in Sub‐Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Habte Belete, Tesfa Mekonen, Jason P. Connor, G. Chan, L. Hides, Janni Leung

Drug and Alcohol Review, 2025

11 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Population‐level smoking (cigarette or tobacco or nicotine use) has reduced in high‐income nations, but not proportionally compared to less developed regions. This study aimed to estimate smoking prevalence in Sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA). Approach Databases searched included PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, African Journal Online, the Global Health Data Exchange and Google Scholar. The search terms included ‘cigarette’, ‘smoking’, ‘tobacco’, ‘nicotine’, ‘prevalence’ and ‘Sub‐Saharan Africa’. Prevalence data on smoking was extracted separately for adolescents (10–17) and adults (18+). Prevalence of lifetime, past 12‐ and 6‐month smoking was included. Weighted pooled prevalence was calculated using MetaXL, while meta‐regression analysis was conducted with Stata version 17. For the estimation of pooled prevalence, we employed a DerSimonian–Laird estimation method. The risk of bias tool was utilised to assess the quality of the studies. Key Findings We included 195 papers. Overall, between 2018 and 2023, the weighted lifetime smoking prevalence was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1, 13.4%), with a past‐year prevalence of 10.8% (CI 4.0%, 19.9%), and daily smoking was 3.5% (CI 0.0%, 9.5%) in SSA. Among adolescents, the lifetime prevalence was 4.5% (CI 2.0%, 8.0%), with a past‐year prevalence of 4.1% (CI 0.0%, 13.4%) and daily smoking was 4.7% (CI 1.0%, 10.6%). Among adults, the lifetime prevalence of smoking was 12.7% (CI 6.6%, 20.4%), 12.1% (CI 2.6%, 26.2%) in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free