Evidence Hub

Unlocking the Link Between Gut Microbiota and Psychopathological Insights in Anorexia Nervosa: A Systematic Review

M. Scala, M. Tabone, M. Paolini, A. Salueña, R. A. Iturra, Veronica Romero Ferreiro, M. Álvarez-Mon, A. Serretti et al.

European eating disorders review, 2025

350 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review explores the associations between qualitative/quantitative changes in gut microbiota and psychopathological symptoms or other clinical features in patients with eating disorders (EDs). Secondary outcomes include exploring gut microbiota changes in EDs and potential relationships with psychotropic drug use.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted across biomedical databases from inception to June 2024 according to PRISMA guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed, and a narrative synthesis was performed due to the heterogeneity of the outcomes.

RESULTS

Only findings related to anorexia nervosa (AN) were identified. Ten studies, of which seven were longitudinal, two cross-sectional, and one interventional (N = 350 patients with AN, and 304 HCs), were included. Despite no clear links between diversity metrics and clinical symptoms being observed, specific taxa belonging to phylum Firmicutes, such as Clostridium, Roseburia, Lactobacillus, Faecalibacterium, and Bifidobacterium belonging to Actinobacteriota correlated with ED psychopathology, including anxiety and depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in microbiota were related to anxiety and depressive symptoms, as well as altered eating behaviours by modulating inflammation and insulin pathways through short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), that also lead to neurotransmitter imbalances. Further studies are required to replicate these finding and to explore whether similar patterns are observed in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 350 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free