Evidence Hub

Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanical Thrombectomy With Anticoagulation Versus Anticoagulation Alone for Acute Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Primary Outcomes from the STORM-PE Trial

R. Lookstein, S. Konstantinides, I. Weinberg, S. Dohad, Z. Rosol, G. Kopeć, John M. Moriarty, S. Parikh et al.

Circulation, 2025

100 participants · 48 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) have an elevated right-to-left-ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio and are at risk of early clinical decompensation and mortality. Reperfusion therapy aims to rapidly relieve acute RV pressure overload and normalize hemodynamics. STORM-PE is the first reported randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy and evaluate the safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT), specifically computer assisted vacuum thrombectomy (CAVT) with anticoagulation (AC) compared to AC alone.

METHODS

STORM-PE is an international RCT with 1:1 randomization to CAVT with AC or AC alone. Eligible adults had acute onset (symptoms ≤14 days), intermediate-high risk PE, and were normotensive, with an RV≤LV ratio ≥1.0 on computed tomography pulmonary angiography and elevated cardiac biomarkers. The primary endpoint analysis tested for a difference between groups for the change in RV/LV ratio at 48 hours, assessed by a blinded independent imaging core laboratory. Secondary endpoints included major adverse events (MAE) within 7 days (a composite of clinical deterioration necessitating rescue therapy, PE-related mortality, symptomatic recurrent PE, and major bleeding), adjudicated by an external clinical events committee. Additional outcomes included change in vital signs and core lab assessed PA obstruction at 48 hours.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients enrolled across 22 sites were randomized to CAVT (N=47) or AC alone (N=53). Baseline…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free