Evidence Hub

Cognitive behavioral therapy skills via a smartphone app for subthreshold depression among adults in the community: the RESiLIENT randomized controlled trial

T. Furukawa, A. Tajika, R. Toyomoto, M. Sakata, Yan Luo, M. Horikoshi, T. Akechi, Norito Kawakami et al.

Nature Medicine, 2025

3,936 participants · 35 citations

Abstract

Subthreshold depression, defined as a depressive status falling short of the diagnostic threshold for major depression, is common, disabling and constitutes a risk factor for future depressive episodes. Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) have been shown to be effective but are usually provided as packages of various skills. Little research has been done to investigate whether all their components are beneficial and contributory to mental health promotion. We addressed this issue by developing a smartphone CBT app that implements five representative CBT skills (behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, problem solving, assertion training and behavior therapy for insomnia), and conducting a master randomized study that included four 2 × 2 factorial trials to enable precise estimation of skill-specific efficacies. Between September 2022 and February 2024, we recruited 3,936 adult participants with subthreshold depression. Among those randomized, the follow-up rate was 97% at week 6 and adherence to the app was 84%. The study showed that all included CBT skills and their combinations differentially beat all three control conditions of delayed treatment, health information or self-check, with effect sizes ranging between −0.67 (95% confidence interval: −0.81 to −0.53) and −0.16 (−0.30 to −0.02) for changes in depressive symptom severity from baseline to week 6, as measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores. Knowledge of the active ingredients of CBT can…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 3,936 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free