Evidence Hub

Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation improves functional dyspepsia with sleep disturbance via enhanced vagal activity: a randomized controlled trial

Jingyao Li, Lian-Li Wang, Yue Zhang, Ruiting Meng, Boxu Zhu, J. Chen, Fei Dai

International Journal of Surgery, 2025

12 citations

Abstract

Background: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is often comorbid with sleep disturbance. Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a new and non-invasive therapeutic option. This study aimed to investigate its effects and possible mechanisms on FD with sleep disturbance. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, single-blind, and randomized controlled trial. Fifty-four FD patients with sleep disturbance were randomly divided to receive 4-week taVNS or transcutaneous non-vagal nerve stimulation (tnVNS). The primary outcomes included Nepean Dyspepsia Index Symptom (NDIS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The secondary outcomes were composed of Nepean Dyspepsia Index Quality of Life (NDIQOL), Hamilton Anxiety (HAMA), Depression (HAMD), autonomic functions, gastric slow waves, gastric accommodation, and serum melatonin. Results: Compared with tnVNS: (1) taVNS resulted in a lower NDIS and PSQI scores (P < 0.05); it also reduced HAMD and HAMA scores but increased NDIQOL score (P < 0.05). (2) taVNS increased the percentage of normal gastric slow waves (NSW%), the maximum tolerable volume, the serum melatonin level, and the high-frequency (HF, reflecting vagal activity) component in the fasting state (P < 0.05). In taVNS group, the HF in the fasting state was positively correlated with the NSW% and the melatonin level. Conclusion: taVNS is effective and safe for the treatment of FD with sleep disturbance. The effect may be attributed to the dual…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free