Evidence Hub

Anthocyanin supplementation in adults at risk for dementia: a randomized controlled trial on its cardiometabolic and anti-inflammatory biomarker effects

M. G. Borda, R. Ramírez-Vélez, Felipe Botero-Rodríguez, Jonathan Patricio-Baldera, C. de Lucia, I. Pola, George E. Barreto, Khadija Khalifa et al.

GeroScience, 2025

99 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

Anthocyanins are dietary flavonoids shown to have a therapeutic capacity to mitigate inflammation and oxidative stress. The present secondary analyses from the “Anthocyanins in People at Risk for Dementia Study” were aimed at (I) determining the intervention’s effect on blood-based markers of cardiovascular disease and inflammation and (II) evaluating whether baseline factors such as age, sex, inflammation, or cardiometabolic score may moderate the intervention’s effect on inflammatory status. This study was an ancillary, 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II trial. Sub-sample participants (n = 99), aged 60–80 years with mild cognitive impairment or cardiometabolic disorders, were randomized to receive either 320 mg/day of anthocyanins or placebo. The biomarkers analyzed included inflammatory biomarker assessment (IL − 6, IL − 8, IL − 10, IL − 1b, TNF − α, IFN − γ), and C-reactive protein (CRP), as well as albumin, thrombocytes, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides, which were longitudinally compared between both groups. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups. ANCOVA analyses reveal 24-week differences favoring the anthocyanin treatment in LDL cholesterol levels (ƞp2 = 0.078; p = 0.015), cardiometabolic score (ƞp2 = 0.073; p = 0.021), CRP levels (ƞp2 = 0.417; p = 0.0001), IL − 6 (ƞp2 = 0.085; p = 0.015), IL − 1b (ƞp2 = 0.058; p = 0.037), and Inflam z-score 5 (ƞp2 = 0.059, p = 0.004). Moderation analysis demonstrated that the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 99 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free