Evidence Hub

Sequential Infusion of Mesenchymal Stem Cell for Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prevention in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

H. Yao, Ruihao Huang, Hai-Xia Fu, R. Lin, Yanqi Zhang, Yi-Mei Feng, Yu Wang, Ting Chen et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025

192 participants · 21 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE The aim of this open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of sequential umbilical cord–derived mesenchymal stem cell (UC-MSC) infusion for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention within 3 months of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). METHODS This open-label study evaluated UC-MSC infusion (administer 1 × 106/kg 4 hours before the commencement of day 0, once weekly for the first month after transplantation, once every 2 weeks for the second month, and once during the third month, totaling eight doses). The primary end point was the 2-year cumulative incidence of severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD). RESULTS In the primary analysis, 192 qualified participants between age 18 and 60 years with haplo-HSCT in three transplant centers in China were enrolled and randomly assigned to the MSC and control groups. In the primary analysis, the estimated 2-year cumulative incidence of severe cGVHD and all grades of cGVHD was lower in the MSC group than in the control group (P = .033 and P = .022). The cumulative incidence of grade 1 to 4, 2 to 4, and 3 to 4 acute GVHD (aGVHD) in patients in the MSC group significantly decreased (all P < .001). The 3-year GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) rate in the MSC group was 62.4%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (32.0%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.34, P < .001). MSC infusion did not influence the cumulative incidence of relapse (P…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 192 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free