Evidence Hub

Second‐Generation (44‐Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Surgical Stability and Safety During a 2‐Year Clinical Trial

Penelope J. Allen, M. Kolic, E. Baglin, Samuel A. Titchener, J. Kvansakul, D. Nayagam, Jonathan Yeoh, Robert J Briggs et al.

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2025

11 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background To assess the safety and stability profile of the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (ScRP) in participants with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) for 2 years from implantation. Methods Four participants, with advanced RP and bare‐light perception vision were enrolled in a prospective, single arm unmasked interventional clinical trial and unilaterally implanted with a 44‐channel ScRP (NCT03406416). Electrical stimulation commenced in the psychophysics laboratory prior to use in local environments. Outcome measures included serious adverse events, adverse events, implant stability and implant functionality to assess the safety and stability profile over 2.0–2.7 years. Results Surgical procedures took 204–260 min and were uncomplicated. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Imaging confirmed the device position under the macula and the absence of retinal trauma. There were no serious adverse events and the adverse events that occurred were mild. All electrodes were functional at surgery completion, and only 3% electrodes lost functionality by study end. There was minor array movement (translational and rotational) within the first 10–15 weeks only. The electrode to retina distance increased as expected with fibrous capsule development, but plateaued in three of four participants within 12 months. Retinal and choroidal thicknesses were consistent with the underlying retinal dystrophic disease. Conclusions The ScRP can be safely implanted in the suprachoroidal space…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free