Evidence Hub

A phase III randomized clinical trial evaluating perioperative therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy) in locally advanced gallbladder cancers (POLCAGB)

Reena Engineer, Mahesh Goel, V. Ostwal, S. Patkar, S. Gudi, A. Ramaswamy, Sadhana Kannan, N. Shetty et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025

314 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

4007

Background:

Locally advanced Gallbladder cancers (LAGBC)initially deemed not suitable for R0 resection receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)or neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT)downstaging for resection and to improve outcomes.

Methods:

This is a randomized phase 3 trial (NCT02867865) that included fit patients with LAGBC adenocarcinoma,. T3/T4 with liver infiltration ( > 2cm, < 5cm); N1 nodal status; obstructive jaundice (type I/II biliary obstruction) ;duodenal or colonic abutment with no mucosal infiltration , < 180°vascular involvement. The patients were randomized (1:1) to NACT arm (Gemcitabine + platinum for four cycles) versus NACRT arm (55 -57Gy with concurrent gemcitabine followed by two cycles of chemotherapy) and were then evaluated for surgery. A sample size of 314 patients was required to detect a 5.5 months difference (11 mo.to 16.5 mo in the test arm) with median overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoint (hazard ratio, 0.7; 2-sided α = 0.05; β = 0.2). Secondary endpoints were event free survival (EFS),R0 resection rates and post-operative complication rates. Due to slow accrual Institutional Ethics committee requested the investigators for interim analysis and approval was obtained for the same.

Results:

From Oct 2016 to Sept 2024

,

124 patients (64 NACT, 60 NACTRT)were enrolled at 2 centers. At the time of analysis 93 OS events were observed in 124 patients. Median follow-up was 62 (range 6.9-94) months. More number of patients underwent R0…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 314 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free