Evidence Hub

How Does Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering Compare to Posterior Spinal Fusion for Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis? A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Carina Lott, Anthony Capraro, Catherine Qiu, Divya Talwar, J. Gordon, John M. Flynn, J. Anari, Patrick J. Cahill

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2025

87 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been an increased interest in alternative surgical options for treating idiopathic scoliosis. For instance, anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is an emerging surgical solution used in lieu of posterior spinal fusion (PSF). This technology has been gaining in popularity because of its potential benefits of preservation of spinal growth, motion, and functional activity. Although prior retrospective studies have indicated the potential efficacy of AVBT in patients with primary thoracic curves, a direct comparison to PSF, the most widely used definitive treatment for pediatric scoliosis, has yet to be conducted. Differences in efficacy, quality of life, and revision risk may exist across the techniques.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We compared AVBT to PSF in terms of (1) the proportion of patients whose main thoracic curve was corrected to < 50° without a return to the operating room for revision within 2 years, (2) residual thoracic and lumbar curve magnitude at 2 years, (3) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores, and (4) the frequency of serious complications and healthcare resource utilization.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2022, patients (n = 87) were assessed for eligibility to participate in an FDA-approved investigational device exemption clinical trial for AVBT based on presenting to the clinic with a diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis that had entered into surgical range. Based on clinical characteristics and the family's stated goals…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 87 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free