Evidence Hub

Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases in Women With Vasomotor Symptoms: A Secondary Analysis of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials

J. Rossouw, A. Aragaki, J. Manson, Emily D. Szmuilowicz, Laura B. Harrington, Karen C. Johnson, Matthew A. Allison, B. Haring et al.

JAMA Internal Medicine, 2025

347 participants · 35 citations

Abstract

Importance

Identification of appropriate patients for treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) with menopausal hormone therapy (HT) is challenging.

Objective

To assess risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to HT in women with VMS.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this secondary analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials of HT, postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years from 40 US clinical centers were included. Data were collected from November 1993 to September 2012, and data were analyzed from December 2024 to May 2025.

Interventions

Conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), 0.625 mg per day, or CEE with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 2.5 mg per day, vs placebo.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD; defined as composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina, coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial disease, carotid artery disease, or CVD death).

Results

Of 27 347 included postmenopausal women, the mean (SD) age was 63.4 (7.2) years; a total of 10 739 (39.3%) had a hysterectomy, and 16 608 (60.7%) had an intact uterus. The median (IQR) follow-up was 7.2 (6.4-8.1) years and 5.6 (4.8-6.5) years for those in the CEE alone trial and the CEE plus MPA trial, respectively. In the CEE alone trial, moderate or severe VMS were present at baseline in 905 (27.6%), 705 (14.7%), and 220 (8.7%) women aged 50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, and 70 to 79 years, respectively; in the CEE plus MPA trial, moderate or severe VMS was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 347 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free