Evidence Hub

Active Monitoring, Surgery, and Radiotherapy for Cribriform-Positive and Cribriform-Negative Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the PROTECT Randomized Clinical Trial

N. Sushentsev, Anne Y. Warren, Richard Colling, Clare Verrill, E. Pazukhina, O. Blyuss, T. Seibert, T. Barrett et al.

JAMA Oncology, 2025

1,643 participants · 21 citations

Abstract

Importance

Cribriform prostate cancer is associated with poor outcomes; however, its optimal treatment strategy remains unclear in the absence of randomized data.

Objective

To retrospectively analyze the results of the PROTECT randomized clinical trial to establish the association between cribriform-positive and cribriform-negative prostate cancer and 15-year risk of metastasis in patients who underwent active monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Between 1999 and 2009, the PROTECT phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled 1643 men with clinically localized prostate cancer who were randomly assigned to receive active monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In this secondary analysis of the PROTECT trial, a centralized histopathologic review was conducted on available diagnostic biopsy slides to classify patients as cribriform-positive if they had invasive cribriform carcinoma and/or intraductal carcinoma. Data were collected from January 25, 2024, to October 11, 2024, and were analyzed from October 14, 2024, to January 30, 2025.

Exposures

Age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and cribriform status.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was progression to metastatic disease (bony, visceral, or lymph node metastases on imaging or PSA >100 ng/mL). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for randomization variables, were incorporated to assess…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,643 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free