Evidence Hub

Effects of Semaglutide With or Without Concomitant Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Use in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A FLOW Trial Prespecified Secondary Analysis

P. Rossing, G. Bakris, V. Perkovic, R. Pratley, K. Tuttle, K. Mahaffey, T. Idorn, N. Belmar et al.

Diabetes Care, 2025

3,276 participants · 21 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE In the Evaluate Renal Function With Semaglutide Once Weekly (FLOW) trial, semaglutide reduced the risk of major kidney and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and all-cause mortality in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This prespecified analysis assessed the effects of semaglutide on kidney, CV, and mortality outcomes by baseline mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Participants were randomized to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg or placebo. The primary kidney outcome was a composite of time to first persistent ≥50% eGFR reduction from baseline, kidney failure, or death from kidney/CV causes. Baseline MRA was predominantly spironolactone; finerenone was only available after recruitment ended. RESULTS Effects were analyzed by baseline MRA use (n = 257 [136 in the semaglutide group and 121 in the placebo group]) and nonuse (n = 3,276 [1,631 in the semaglutide group and 1,645 in the placebo group]). Semaglutide reduced the risk of the primary kidney outcome by 49% (59 events; hazard ratio [HR] 0.51 [95% CI 0.30, 0.86]) and 21% (682 events; HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.68, 0.92]; P-interaction = 0.12) versus placebo in MRA and non-MRA subgroups, respectively. There was no heterogeneity, favoring the effects of semaglutide on major adverse CV events (MACE) and all-cause mortality in both MRA subgroups (P-interaction > 0.7). Albuminuria at 104 weeks was reduced from baseline with semaglutide by 15% (95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 3,276 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free