Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of repeated Esketamine nasal spray administration on anhedonic symptoms in treatment-resistant bipolar and unipolar depression: A secondary analysis from the REAL-ESK study group

G. d'Andrea, C. Cavallotto, M. Pettorruso, G. Di Lorenzo, Rosalba Carullo, D. de Berardis, Gianluca Rosso, Stefano Barlati et al.

Psychiatry Research, 2025

22 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Anhedonia, defined as the diminished ability to experience or anticipate pleasure, is a core symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar depression (BD), and associated with depression severity, suicidality and poor treatment outcomes. Conventional antidepressants demonstrate limited efficacy against anhedonia. Esketamine nasal spray (ESK-NS) - a novel NMDA receptor antagonist approved for treatment-resistant depression - has demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects, though its specific impact on anhedonia remains underexplored.

METHODS

This multicenter, observational, real-world study included 253 treatment-resistant patients (199 with unipolar depression/TRD; 54 with bipolar depression/B-TRD). All participants received repeated administrations of ESK-NS adjunctive to their current medication regimen. Anhedonia was assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) anhedonia subscale at baseline, after one month (T1), and three months (T2). Response was defined as a ≥50 % reduction in MADRS anhedonia subscale score from baseline. Adverse effects were systematically monitored.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in anhedonia were observed in both TRD and B-TRD groups, and these effects were distinct from overall depressive symptom reduction (p < 0.001). Response rates at T2 were 51.92 % in B-TRD and 38 % in TRD patients. Drop-out rates were 12.96 % in B-TRD and 14 % in TRD, primarily due to inefficacy or side effects. Safety profiles…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free