Evidence Hub

Nutritional deficiencies after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at 10 years: secondary analysis of the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial

Ilmari Saarinen, M. Strandberg, S. Hurme, M. Helmiö, Sofia Grönroos, A. Juuti, R. Juusela, P. Nuutila et al.

British Journal of Surgery, 2025

240 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Long-term data on the prevalence of nutritional deficiencies after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in RCTs are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare nutritional deficiencies and adherence to vitamin supplements after LSG and LRYGB at 10 years. Methods This was a predefined secondary analysis of the Finnish SLEEVEPASS (LSG versus LRYGB for severe obesity) multicentre RCT, with 10-year nutritional laboratory measurements and completed questionnaires on micronutrient supplement use, to assess the prevalence of micronutritional and macronutritional deficiencies and adherence. Results Of 240 patients (121 LSG patients and 119 LRYGB patients), 228 were available for 10-year follow-up. Of these 228 patients, 190 (83.3%) were available for laboratory tests and 192 (84.2%) for questionnaires. There were no statistically significant differences between LSG and LRYGB in the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency (10 of 94 (11%) versus 9 of 84 (11%) respectively; P = 0.545), the prevalence of hypocalcaemia (3 of 92 (3%) versus 1 of 83 (1%) respectively; P = 0.088), the prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency (2 of 46 (5%) versus 0 of 45 (0%); P = 0.240), or mean vitamin B12 levels (P = 0.939). The prevalence of iron deficiency, defined by ferritin level, was statistically significantly lower after LSG compared with LRYGB (4 of 29 (14%) versus 12 of 29 (41%); P = 0.017), with a median ferritin level of 34…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 240 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free