Evidence Hub

Effects of multidomain lifestyle intervention on frailty among older men and women – a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Laura Saarela, J. Lehtisalo, T. Ngandu, S. Kyrönlahti, Satu Havulinna, T. Strandberg, E. Levälahti, R. Antikainen et al.

Annals medicus, 2025

1,259 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome associated with poor clinical outcomes. Effectiveness of lifestyle intervention programmes among frail older people has been examined earlier, but effects of interventions on prevention of frailty have been rarely studied. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the multidomain lifestyle intervention in the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) affected changes in frailty status among older men and women at risk of cognitive disorders. Methods The 2-year multidomain lifestyle intervention trial including simultaneous nutritional counseling, physical exercise, cognitive training and social activity, and management of metabolic and vascular risk factors, was conducted among 1259 older people (mean age 68.9 years). A modified Fried’s frailty phenotype (weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slowness, and low physical activity) was used to assess frailty at baseline and after the 2-year intervention. Participants with one or more components of the frailty phenotype were classified as pre-frail or frail. A multinomial regression model was applied to investigate efficacy of the intervention on frailty. Results We observed a favorable trend in reversing frailty among older men with the intervention. Pre-frail or frail men in the intervention group had higher probability of being non-frail after the intervention (44%) than pre-frail or frail men in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,259 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free