Evidence Hub

The effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on the inflammatory response in septic shock: a secondary analysis of the EXCHANGE-1 trial

Andrea Sauer, Klaus Stahl, B. Seeliger, P. Wendel-Garcia, Felix Lehmann, Julius Schmidt, Bernhard M. W. Schmidt, Tobias Welte et al.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 2025

13 citations

Abstract

Sepsis and septic shock, defined by a profound immune dysregulation, are among the leading causes of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite advances in understanding the underlying pathophysiology, evidence for specific immunomodulatory treatment does not exist to date. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) represents an adjunctive treatment approach to rebalance immune homeostasis. In the EXCHANGE-1 trial, we recently demonstrated a rapid hemodynamic improvement, possibly caused by the removal of harmful mediators and the replacement of protective plasma proteins. The aim of this secondary analysis is to further characterize the underlying immunomodulatory effects and to identify biomarkers that may predict treatment response. This secondary analysis included patients in early septic shock (< 24 h duration) and a norepinephrine (NE) dose of ≥ 0.4 μg/kg/min. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive standard of care (SOC) or SOC + one single TPE and plasma samples were collected before and after TPE. Within-group and between group effects of circulating levels of acute-phase proteins [CRP and Pentraxin3 (PTX3)], inflammatory mediators (IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IL-2Rα/CD25) and damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) [cell-free DNA (cfDNA)] were analyzed via paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a mixed-effects model. Multivariate mixed‐effects modeling of NE and lactate reduction was performed to investigate if cfDNA could be associated with treatment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free