Evidence Hub

Cardiovascular Benefit of Colchicine in Relation to Baseline Risk: A Secondary Analysis of the LoDoCo2 Trial

N. Mohammadnia, Britta E Wesselink, W. Bax, S. Nidorf, A. Mosterd, A. Fiolet, A. Cetinyurek-Yavuz, Peter L. Thompson et al.

Journal of the American Heart Association : Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2025

5,522 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

Background The LoDoCo2 (Low‐Dose Colchicine 2) trial showed that colchicine reduced the risk for cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Current guidelines recommend colchicine use in selected high‐risk patients. The aim of this secondary analysis was to explore the relative and absolute benefits of colchicine according to baseline risk. Methods The LoDoCo2 trial randomized 5522 patients to colchicine 0.5 mg or placebo. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or ischemia‐driven coronary revascularization. First, a LoDoCo2 risk score was developed by Cox regression to identify high‐risk features for the primary end point. Second, the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention was applied to explore robustness of findings. Results In the LoDoCo2 risk score, high‐risk features were age ≥75, diabetes, and current smoker. In high‐risk (≥1 high‐risk feature), compared with low‐risk (0 high‐risk features) patients, colchicine was associated with consistent relative (high risk: hazard ratio [HR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.56–0.94] versus low risk: HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.52–0.88]; P for interaction=0.73) and absolute benefits (high risk: HR, −1.33 [95% CI, −2.38 to −0.27] versus low risk: HR, −0.93 [95% CI −1.57 to −0.30] events per 100 person‐years). Using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention, consistent relative and absolute…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 5,522 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free