Evidence Hub

Placental lesions in small for gestational age fetuses with and without clinical features of fetal growth restriction: a secondary analysis of the DRIGITAT study

M. Marijnen, L. E. van der Meeren, M. Schoots, A. Freedman, L. Ernst, E. Bazyleva, W. Ganzevoort, S. Gordijn

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025

690 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The primary pathophysiological mechanism underlying fetal growth restriction (FGR) is placental insufficiency, which can be attributed to various placental lesions. It is unknown if ultrasound markers can antenatally detect and distinguish between different placental lesions and their grading. This study aimed to investigate the association between placental lesions, clinical markers including Doppler velocimetry and birth outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a secondary analysis of the DRIGITAT study, a multicenter prospective cohort with nested randomized controlled trial of late preterm small for gestational age (SGA) pregnancies. Placental slides were independently revised, scored and classified using a digital synoptic reporting tool, according to the Amsterdam Consensus criteria and the Freedman-Ernst subclassification, by two perinatal pathologists blinded to clinical data, except for gestational age. Pregnancy characteristics and birth outcomes of cases with placental pathology available were compared to those without. Within the group with pathology available, participants were classified as FGR (two consecutive abnormal Doppler measurements: umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) >0.8 and/or umbilical artery pulsatility index (UmbA PI) >p90), potential FGR (once or intermittent abnormal UCR and/or UmbA PI), or SGA not otherwise specified (NOS) (never abnormal UCR or UmbA PI). Placental lesion prevalence and grading were analyzed in relation to Doppler ultrasound…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 690 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free