Evidence Hub

Efficacy of ubrogepant and atogepant in males and females with migraine: A secondary analysis of randomized clinical trials

P. Goadsby, T. Jürgens, E. Brand-Schieber, Krisztian Nagy, Ying-Yi Liu, Ramesh R. Boinpally, S. Stodtmann, Joel M. Trugman

Cephalalgia, 2025

12 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Published evidence supporting efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists as acute migraine treatments in males is limited.

METHODS: To fill the gap, we present male and female data from four ubrogepant and four atogepant randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials for acute and preventive treatment of migraine, respectively. Acute outcomes included 2-h pain freedom and absence of most bothersome symptom (co-primary; headache-phase randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials); absence of moderate-to-severe headache within 24 h (primary; prodrome randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial). Preventive outcome included change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days across 12 weeks (primary).

RESULTS: Pooled data from phase 3 headache-phase ubrogepant randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials showed similar rates of pain freedom (19.4% vs 21.1%) and absence of most bothersome symptom (35.1% vs 39.0%) 2 h post-dose between males and females, respectively. Time course of pain freedom and absence of most bothersome symptom over 48 h was similar between male and female subgroups. Comparable reductions in mean monthly migraine days across 12-week treatment periods were found between males and females treated with atogepant 60 mg once-daily in pooled episodic migraine and chronic migraine randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: In ubrogepant and atogepant randomized,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free