Evidence Hub

Risk of postpartum hemorrhage according to the planned mode of delivery among pregnant women with one previous cesarean delivery: a secondary analysis of the Lower Uterine Segment Trial (LUSTrial)

Anne-Sophie Boucherie, T. Quibel, C. Thuillier, P. Rozenberg, A. Rousseau

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025

2,948 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postpartum hemorrhage is the most common complication in obstetrics and is a leading cause of serious maternal morbidity. Women with one previous cesarean delivery are at risk for postpartum hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of postpartum hemorrhage according to the planned mode of delivery among women with one previous cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a secondary analysis of the Lower Uterine Segment Trial. The primary outcome was postpartum hemorrhage, and the secondary outcome was a composite of severe postpartum hemorrhage including the need for blood transfusion, second-line therapy to stop bleeding, or hysterectomy. The exposure was the planned mode of delivery, which was decided at around 36 weeks of gestation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with a random intercept of the maternity unit was used to assess the relationship between the planned mode of delivery and postpartum hemorrhage. A secondary analysis using inverse probability weighting was performed to limit indication bias.

RESULTS

Of the 2948 women included in the Lower Uterine Segment Trial, 2889 women were included in this secondary analysis; 2689 (93.0%) chose planned vaginal delivery and 200 (7.0%) planned cesarean delivery. The rate of postpartum hemorrhage was lower in the planned cesarean delivery group than in the planned vaginal delivery group (2.5% versus 7.5%, adjusted odds ratio 0.28 [0.11-0.69] P<.01). The rate of the composite…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,948 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free