Evidence Hub

Maternal anaemia and risk of neonatal and infant mortality in low- and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis of 45 national datasets

Eleni Tsamantioti, T. Alfvén, M. Z. Hossin, Neda Razaz

BMJ Global Health, 2025

106 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

Background Anaemia in pregnancy has been recognised worldwide as a growing public health concern and an important cause of adverse neonatal outcomes. However, only a limited number of studies have been done in low-income settings, which have the highest prevalence of anaemia. We aimed to investigate the association between maternal anaemia and neonatal and infant mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Methods Secondary analysis of pooled data from 45 national demographic and health surveys (2010–2020). We included all women between 15 and 49 years old, who had singleton live birth within 1 year preceding the survey, with a valid maternal measurement of haemoglobin. We used logistic regression models to estimate the crude and adjusted OR (aOR) with 95% CIs of the association between maternal anaemia (measured at the time of the survey) and the risk of neonatal and infant mortality. Results Among 106 143 women included in our analysis, there were 53 348 (50.5%) women with no anaemia, 24 670 (23.2%) with mild anaemia, 25 937 (24.3%) with moderate anaemia and 2188 (2.0%) with severe anaemia. Overall, there were 2668 (2.5%) neonatal and 3756 (3.5%) infant deaths. Moderate (aOR 1.20; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.35) and severe (aOR 1.89; 95% CI 1.46 to 2.44) maternal anaemia were associated with increased odds of neonatal mortality, respectively. Similar estimates were observed for moderate and severe anaemia and infant mortality. No increased risk was noted for mild anaemia.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free