Evidence Hub

What is the Surgical Burden of Treatment for High-Energy Lower Extremity Trauma? A Secondary Analysis of the OUTLET Study

Christopher C. Stewart, Lisa M. Reider, Rachel Soifer, Nikan K. Namiri, Robert V. O'Toole, M. Karunakar, Benjamin K. Potter, Michael J. Bosse et al.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma, 2025

472 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe and enumerate surgeries for patients who underwent reconstruction or amputation after severe distal tibial, ankle, and mid- to hindfoot injuries. METHODS: Design: Secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Setting: Thirty-one US level I trauma centers and 3 military treatment facilities. Patient Selection Criteria: Participants aged 18 to 60 years with Gustilo type-III pilon fracture (Orthopaedic Trauma Association [OTA] 43B or 43C), IIIB or C ankle fracture (OTA 44A, 44B, or 44C), type-III talar or calcaneal fracture (OTA 81B, 82B, or 82C), or open or closed crush or blast injuries to the hindfoot or midfoot who underwent limb reconstruction or amputation from 2012 to 2017. Outcome Measurements and Comparisons: The number of temporizing, definitive, and complication surgeries was compared by treatment and injury. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-four participants with 221 ankle and pilon injuries, 140 talus and calcaneal injuries, and 213 other foot injuries were followed for 18 months. The mean age was 38 (range 8–64) years, and 33% were female. Participants underwent reconstruction (n = 472), primary amputation (n = 76), and failed reconstruction followed by amputation (n = 26). Eight hundred forty-one temporizing, 958 definitive, and 501 complication surgeries were performed. The number of surgeries was highest for those who underwent failed reconstruction [mean 5.8, 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.9–6.8, range 3–13]…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 472 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free