Evidence Hub

Cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose index versus triglyceride–glucose index in predicting cardiovascular disease risk: a cohort study

Degang Mo, Peng Zhang, Miao Zhang, Hong-Yan Dai, Jun Guan

Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2025

6,249 participants · 116 citations

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a significant global health challenge, characterized by high incidence rates and substantial morbidity and mortality. A newer index, the Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein, and Glucose (CHG) index, has been proposed as a potential diagnostic tool for metabolic disorders but has not been investigated for its ability to predict CVD risk. This study aims to evaluate the predictive efficacy of the CHG index in comparison to the well-established Triglyceride–Glucose (TyG) index. In this cohort study, 6249 adults aged 45 and older were recruited from the CHARLS database, with data collected from 2011 to 2020. CVD events were tracked over a nine-year follow-up. The TyG and CHG indices were calculated, and their relationships with CVD risk were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. Additionally, restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was performed to further explore these associations. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to compare the predictive performance of both indices, and subgroup analysis evaluated their applicability in different populations. Among the 6249 participants, 1667 (26.68%) developed CVD during the nine-year follow-up. In unadjusted Cox regression models, the TyG index had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.18 (95% confidence interval CI 1.10–1.27, p 0.05). An elevated CHG index is significantly correlated with an increased risk of CVD, demonstrating a linear relationship.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,249 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free