Evidence Hub

Tafamidis in octogenarians with wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: an international cohort study

P. Debonnaire, K. Dujardin, N. Verheyen, A. Pouleur, S. Droogmans, M. Claeys, A. Bohyn, Kris Bogaerts et al.

European Heart Journal, 2025

394 participants · 30 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims In real-world, wild-type transthyretin cardiomyopathy is increasingly diagnosed in patients ≥ 80 years old (octogenarians), although being underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. Specific data on natural course and outcome under tafamidis treatment in octogenarians are therefore scarce. The impact of tafamidis treatment on mortality in real-world wild-type transthyretin cardiomyopathy octogenarians was studied. Methods An international, multicentre cohort study of 710 consecutive wild-type transthyretin cardiomyopathy patients with mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 1.8 years for all-cause mortality endpoint was performed. Results The cohort consisted of 58.5% (415/710) octogenarians (85 ± 4 years, 74.2% male). Before tafamidis availability, natural course in octogenarians (148/257) vs. non-octogenarians (109/257) was poor, with 16% 1-year and 71% 5-year mortality vs. 8% and 47%, respectively (P < .001). Since tafamidis availability, 70.1% (253/361) octogenarians were initiated on tafamidis vs. 83.7% (231/276) non-octogenarians (P < .001). Tafamidis discontinuation was similar (octogenarians 10.3% and non-octogenarians 7.4%; P = .260). Overall tafamidis treated vs. untreated octogenarians had better unadjusted survival (P < .001), with 5% 1-year and 24% 3-year mortality. Tafamidis treatment associated with lower mortality after propensity score matching on baseline variables, including age, National Amyloidosis Centre stage, and New York Heart…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 394 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free