Evidence Hub

Breast neurotization along with breast reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy enhances quality of life and reduces denervation symptoms in patient-reported outcome: a prospective cohort study

Shiuan Shyu, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang, J. Lu, Chia-Fang Chen, David Chon-Fok Cheong, Shu-Wei Kao, Wen-Ling Kuo, Jung-Ju Huang

International Journal of Surgery, 2025

132 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Objective: Persistent postoperative sensory loss significantly limits breast reconstruction following mastectomy. In addition, the absence of sensation profoundly impacts patients’ physical well-being and overall quality of life. New surgical techniques involving nerve autograft intercostal nerve elongation have been introduced to neurotize reconstructed breasts. However, patient quality of life after neurotization has not been well evaluated. This study aimed to investigate improvements in patient quality of life in association with breast neurotization. Methods: A prospective cohort study of 132 patients treated at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between January 2018 and December 2022 was conducted. Two groups of patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and breast reconstruction were compared: those with (n = 67) and without (n = 65) breast neurotization. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed via the BREAST-Q reconstruction module questionnaire and an additional questionnaire measuring sensation, nipple satisfaction, and breast symptoms. Objective measurements were conducted via the Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments test. Results: With respect to patient-reported outcomes, the innervated group had significantly higher scores for nipple sensation and on the BREAST-Q domains of psychosocial well-being (71.6 ± 18.1 vs. 62.8 ± 18.6, P = 0.006), sexual well-being (56.9 ± 22.1 vs. 47.3 ± 20.7, P = 0.015), satisfaction with the medical team, as well as less frequent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 132 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free