Evidence Hub

Global burden and characterization of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis: results from a systematic review and a multi-center cohort study

Zhengyang Fan, Yue-Lun Zhang, Jia-Ning Li, Wen-Hua He, Xiao-Yin Bai, Yan-Na Cai, Nai-Shi Li, Feng Xie et al.

Science China Life Sciences, 2025

3,057,428 participants · 22 citations

Abstract

To compare and characterize hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTG-AP) across the geographical regions, we conducted a systematic review and a multi-center cohort study. We conducted a systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of studies reporting HTG-AP. Also, we separately characterized HTG-AP in a multi-center retrospective cohort study involving eight centers in China. The key outcomes of interest included the pooled proportion of HTG-AP and its severity parameters after adjusting for the effect of confounding factors through logistic regression. Our systematic review identified 110 studies from 15 countries accounting for 3,057,428 participants (35% female, median age 50 years). The pooled proportion of HTG-AP was 11.6% globally while the Eastern and Western countries reported the proportions as 16.3% and 5.4%, respectively (P<0.01). The pooled mortality rate was remarkably higher in Eastern countries (4.1%) than in Western countries (1.0%) (P<0.01). 3,224 participants (37% female, median age 48 years) were included in our multi-center cohort study, and the proportion of HTG-AP was much higher at 35.9% with a nearly three-fold higher mortality rate compared with acute pancreatitis (AP) due to other etiologies (odds ratio (OR): 2.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.60 to 4.81). The proportion of patients with HTG-AP is remarkably higher in Eastern countries, particularly China, than in Western countries. Furthermore, compared with other causes of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,057,428 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free