Evidence Hub

Non-invasive prediction of NSCLC immunotherapy efficacy and tumor microenvironment through unsupervised machine learning-driven CT radiomic subtypes: a multi-cohort study

Yu-Sheng Guo, Bing-Xin Gong, Yi Li, P. Mo, Yiqun Chen, Qianqian Fan, Qing Sun, Lianwei Miao et al.

International Journal of Surgery, 2025

1,539 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

Background: Radiomics analyzes quantitative features from medical images to reveal tumor heterogeneity, offering new insights for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment prediction. This study explored radiomics based biomarkers to predict immunotherapy response and its association with the tumor microenvironment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using unsupervised machine learning models derived from CT imaging. Materials and methods: This study included 1539 NSCLC patients from seven independent cohorts. For 1834 radiomic features extracted from 869 NSCLC patients, K-means unsupervised clustering was applied to identify radiomic subtypes. A random forest model extended subtype classification to external cohorts, model accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were evaluated. By conducting bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and single-cell transcriptome sequencing (scRNA-seq) of tumors, the immune microenvironment characteristics of tumors can be obtained to evaluate the association between radiomic subtypes and immunotherapy efficacy, immune scores, and immune cells infiltration. Results: Unsupervised clustering stratified NSCLC patients into two subtypes (Cluster 1 and Cluster 2). Principal component analysis confirmed significant distinctions between subtypes across all cohorts. Cluster 2 exhibited significantly longer median overall survival (35 vs. 30 months, P = 0.006) and progression-free survival (19 vs. 16 months, P = 0.020) compared to Cluster 1. Multivariate Cox…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,539 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free