Evidence Hub

Association between blood inflammatory status and the survival of tuberculosis: a five-year cohort study

Ya-Ting Ji, Qingyao Xie, Wei Wei, Zhen Huang, Xuhui Liu, Qi Ye, Yan-Ping Liu, Xiao-Yu Lu et al.

Frontiers in Immunology, 2025

4,027 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

Background Blood inflammatory status is closely associated with tuberculosis (TB) progression. Emerging inflammatory indices from different leukocyte subtypes have become a prognostic hotspot for various diseases, yet their application in TB prognosis remains limited. This study aims to assess the impact of inflammatory status on TB patients’ prognosis and its potential as a prognostic indicator to optimize prognostic assessment and therapeutic strategies. Methods This study included 4027 TB patients admitted to a tuberculosis-designated hospital in Shenzhen from January 2017 to December 2022. Patients were classified into three inflammatory statuses (Q1-Q3) based on each index’s level. We conducted Cox regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) analyses to evaluate the association between inflammatory status and unfavorable outcome, subgroup analyses to understand heterogeneous associations among subpopulations, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to evaluate the prognostic performance of inflammatory status on TB treatment outcomes. Results During 48991.79 person-months of follow-up involving 4027 patients, 225 unfavorable outcomes occurred. Multivariable Cox regression indicated that the Q3 levels of CAR, CLR, dNLR, NLR, SII, and SIRI increased the risk of unfavorable outcome by 45%-99% (HR: 1.45-1.99, all P0.050), and nonlinear for MLR, NLR, and PNI (all P for nonlinear<0.050). Subgroup analyses identified heterogeneous associations across age, sex,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 4,027 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free