Evidence Hub

Neuroprotective effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists in neurodegenerative Disorders: A Large-Scale Propensity-Matched cohort study

Nabeela Siddeeque, M. Hussein, A. Abdelmaksoud, Julia Bishop, Abdallah S. Attia, R. Elshazli, M. Fawzy, E. Toraih

International Immunopharmacology, 2024

5,307,845 participants · 96 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

GLP-1 receptor agonists, traditionally used for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, have demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties. However, their potential neuroprotective effects in neurodegenerative disorders remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists on the risk of developing various neurodegenerative conditions in obese patients.

METHODS

This comprehensive retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 5,307,845 obese adult patients across 73 healthcare organizations in 17 countries. Propensity score matching was performed, resulting in 102,935 patients in each cohort. We compared the risk of developing neurodegenerative disorders between obese patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy and those who were not.

RESULTS

Obese patients treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists showed significantly lower risks of developing Alzheimer's disease (RR = 0.627, 95 %CI = 0.481-0.817), Lewy body dementia (RR = 0.590, 95 %CI = 0.462-0.753), and vascular dementia (RR = 0.438, 95 %CI = 0.327-0.588). The risk reduction for Parkinson's disease was not statistically significant overall (RR = 0.784, 95 %CI = 0.580-1.058) but was significant for semaglutide users (RR = 0.574, 95 %CI = 0.369-0.893). Semaglutide consistently showed the most pronounced protective effects across all disorders. Additionally, a significant reduction in all-cause mortality was observed (HR = 0.525, 95 %CI = 0.493-0.558).

CONCLUSION

This study provides…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 5,307,845 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free