Evidence Hub

The predictive value of the hs-CRP/HDL-C ratio, an inflammation-lipid composite marker, for cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and elderly people: evidence from a large national cohort study

Yu Gao, Miyuan Wang, Rui-Ting Wang, Jinchi Jiang, Yueyao Hu, Wei Wang, Yong Wang, Hai-Jing Li

Lipids in Health and Disease, 2024

6,554 participants · 94 citations

Abstract

Background and aims Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is associated with inflammation and abnormal lipid metabolism. However, a single inflammatory index or a single lipid index cannot accurately predict the prognosis of CVD independently because it is prone to be affected by various confounding factors. Methods This population-based cohort study included 6,554 participants from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) to investigate correlations. In the present study, the occurrence of CVD events such as stroke and heart disease was evaluated by considering self-reported diagnoses at the beginning of the study and during wave 4, and a restricted cubic spline model was used to investigate potential nonlinear relationships in addition to multivariate logistic regression models. Stratified analyses were performed to examine how sociodemographic characteristics may influence the results. Results Seven years of follow-up (2011–2018) revealed that 786 people (11.99%) developed CVD. According to the adjusted model, the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio is a contributing factor to CVD risk (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.05–1.64). In addition, a nonlinear relationship was observed between the hs-CRP/HDL-C ratio and the occurrence of new CVD, stroke, or cardiac issues ( P _overall <0.05, _Pnonlinear <0.05). Moreover, noteworthy associations between the hs-CRP/HDL-C ratio and age were detected in the stratified…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,554 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free