Evidence Hub

Cognitive and psychiatric symptom trajectories 2-3 years post-COVID-19 hospitalisation: a longitudinal prospective cohort study

M. Taquet, Zuzanna Skorniewska, Thomas De Deyn, Adam Hampshire, W. Trender, P. Hellyer, J. Chalmers, L. Ho et al.

Lancet psychiatry, 2024

475 participants · 51 citations

Abstract

Background COVID-19 is known to be associated with increased risks of cognitive and psychiatric outcomes. However, whether these symptoms can emerge or persist beyond the first year post-infection, what early aspects of the COVID-19 illness predict them, and how they relate to occupational functioning remain unknown. This study aimed to answer these questions. Methods The Post-hospitalisation COVID-19 study (PHOSP-COVID) is a prospective, longitudinal cohort study of adults hospitalised with COVID-19 across the UK. Between 2 and 3 years post-hospitalisation, a subset of participants completed a computerised cognitive test, and clinical scales for subjective cognitive decline, depression, anxiety, and fatigue. We evaluated how the absolute risks of these symptoms evolved between the 6-month, 12-month, and 2-3-year follow-ups and whether symptoms at 2-3 years were predicted by earlier aspects of the COVID-19 illness. Additionally, we assessed whether participants changed their occupation, if so why, and which symptoms at 2-3 years were associated with occupational changes. Findings 475 participants provided data at the 2-3 years follow-up (mean [SD] age 58.3 [11.1] years, 40.2% female, 59.8% male). Participants had worse cognitive scores than would be expected for their sociodemographic characteristics, across all cognitive domains tested (average score 0.71 SD below the mean, IQR: 0.16–1.04 SD). Most participants reported at least mild depression, anxiety, fatigue, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 475 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free