Evidence Hub

Clinical risk factors associated with nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia in patients within a tertiary care healthcare setting – a case control study

Özge Yetiş, Shanom Ali, Pietro Coen, Peter Wilson

Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 2025

845 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

P. aeruginosa is a major cause of hospital-acquired infections, particularly in healthcare settings in the UK and Europe. In 2017, the number of patients with P. aeruginosa bacteraemia in a London teaching hospital was increasing and demographic studies had attempted to identify the cause. A case–control study was undertaken with the aim to determine the pre-existing risk factors for developing P. aeruginosa bacteraemia among hospital inpatients, many of whom were immunocompromised. Multivariable, matched, case-control analysis using conditional logistic regression was performed to determine the risk factors associated with acquisition of P. aeruginosa bacteraemia at a tertiary care teaching hospital (800 patient beds; 98 beds for haematology patients) in London, UK. The cases were 137 patients with hospital-onset P. aeruginosa detected in blood and two control groups comprising a total of 845 patients (treated between April 2015 – July 2018). The analysis included the following predictor variables: admission method, blood test results, known viral infection, presence of central lines, surgical history, urinary tract infection and P. aeruginosa detected in urine, wound, or respiratory system. SPSS and R were used for the statistical analysis. Of 135 patients with bacteraemia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 23 (17%) died within 30 days compared with 20 (4.1%) of 488 matched patients with no bacteraemia and 24 (6.7%) of 357 patients with other causes of bacteraemia. Analysis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 845 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free