Evidence Hub

Risk factors for OXA-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales acquisition in Israel: A retrospective case control study

Maisam Amar, O. Barnett-Griness, Gabriel Weber, Shereen Shehade, Rabah Yasin, Anat Arbel, R. Najjar-Debbiny

American Journal of Infection Control, 2025

96,306 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

OXA-producing carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (OXA-CPE) are challenging hospital-centered screening approaches. This study aimed to identify risk-factors for CPE acquisition, focusing on OXA-CPE.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted using data from Clalit Health Services. Adults (≥ 20 years) hospitalized between 2016 and 2023 and screened for CPE were included. Cases were defined as first-time CPE-positive. Each case was matched 1:1 to a hospitalized control from the same hospital, department, and admission date. Exposure data included comorbidities, hospitalizations, outpatient clinic visits, recent antibiotic use, and socioeconomic status. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors for CPE acquisition. Subgroup analysis compared risk-factors for OXA-CPE versus non-OXA-CPE.

RESULTS

Among 96,306 screened patients, 1,609 CPE-positive cases were matched to controls. Median age was comparable in CPE cases and controls (70.5 vs 69 years respectively). Significant CPE risk factors included chronic ventilation (OR = 3.16), diabetes (OR = 1.33), multiple hospitalizations (OR > 3.9), Arab ethnicity (OR = 2.07), and recent antibiotic use (OR = 1.96). In subgroup analysis, risk-factors were similar between OXA and non-OXA groups, except for Arab ethnicity, which had a stronger association with OXA-CPE (OR = 3.36 vs 1.39, interaction P = .0059). No interaction was found for other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

CPE acquisition…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 96,306 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free