Evidence Hub

Association Between Sleeping Quality and Risk of Breast Cancer Among Women: A Case-Control Study From Pakistan

Huma Naqeeb, Zia-ud-Din, Imran Khan, I. Haq, Falak Zeb, Bibi Hajira, Iftikhar Alam, Zafar Iqbal et al.

Cancer Control: Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Cente, 2024

408 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background This case-control study investigated the relationship between sleep duration and quality with the occurrence of breast cancer among women, both pre- and post-menopausal, in the northwest Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) region of Pakistan. Method This case-control research was carried in multiple tertiary care facilities. Newly diagnosed primary breast cancer patients were recruited as cases (n = 408), and 5+ years age-matched controls (n = 408) were randomly selected from the general population. Participants completed a Pittsburg sleeping quality index (PSQI) questionnaire that included questions on sleep characteristics. Statistical analysis included independent t-tests to compare mean sleep durations and quality scores between groups, and logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders. Results Sleep onset latency between cases and controls was not significantly associated with health outcomes, with a P-value of .142. However, sleep duration showed a significant association (P = .049). For sleep duration, the adjusted odds ratio for ≤6 h was 1.02 (95% CI: .5-2.1), while for 7-8 h the adjusted odds ratio was 1.0 (95% CI: .6-1.6). Self-reported sleep quality did not demonstrate significant associations, with the P-value for “very good” sleep quality being .561. Sleep duration of less than 6 h among women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) was found to be strongly associated with a more aggressive type of breast cancer, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.5…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 408 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free