Evidence Hub

M1UKStreptococcus pyogenes causing community-acquired pneumonia, pleural empyema and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome

Mavroidi A, Katsiaflaka A, Petinaki E, Froukala E, Papadopoulos D, Vrioni G, Tsakris A

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance, 2024

13 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Streptococcus pyogenes causes superficial infections, but can also cause deep-seated infections and toxin-mediated diseases. In the present study, phylogenetic and in silico prediction analyses were performed on an antimicrobial-resistant M1UK S. pyogenes strain causing severe clinical manifestations during the current surge of invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS) disease. Patient and Methods: A 40-year-old patient was admitted to the hospital with fever, chest pain, and fatigue. Based on the clinical and laboratory findings a diagnosis of sepsis with disseminated intravascular coagulation, community-acquired pneumonia, pleural empyema and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome was made. Microbial identification was performed by multiplex PCR and conventional culturing. Furthermore, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole genome sequencing, phylogenomic analysis, and in silico prediction analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors were performed. Results: S. pyogenes isolates were detected in pleural fluid and sputum of the patient. Both isolates belonged to the M1UK lineage of the emm1/ST28 clone, being closely related with an M1UK GAS strain from Australia. They exhibited resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin, and susceptibility-increased exposure to levofloxacin and carried genes encoding for protein homologues of antibiotic efflux pumps. Moreover, several virulence factors, and a previously described single-nucleotide polymorphism…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free