Evidence Hub

Case report: Remarkable efficacy of negative-pressure wound therapy in giant lower extremity elephantiasis neuromatosa for vascularization, skin grafting, and fluid control

Lisa Y. Hasibuan, Almahitta Cintami Putri, Graciella Novian Triana Wahjoe Pramono

International journal of surgery case reports, 2024

3 citations

Abstract

Introduction and importance Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a benign peripheral nerve tumor, often manifests as plexiform neurofibroma that may cause severe dysfunction, pain, and disfigurement. Bleeding has been reported as a complication of plexiform neurofibroma due to vascular fragility and vasculopathy that may develop into life-threatening bleeding especially after excision procedure. Consequently, post excision complications also include dehiscence and infection. Case presentation We report a 23-year-old male with elephantiasis of the left lower extremity due to giant plexiform neurofibroma who underwent preoperative embolization followed by serial surgical mass reduction. There were postoperative complications consisting of hematoma, wound dehiscence, and infection. Clinical discussion Negative pressure wound therapy is often used to accelerate wound healing, including infected wounds. However, negative pressure wound therapy has been a debatable modality for wound care of neurofibroma due to reported risks of profuse bleeding during its use. Conclusion In this case, despite the size, negative-pressure wound therapy has shown good results for infected neurofibroma wounds and as an adjunct as wound dressing for defect closure of neurofibroma with split-thickness skin graft.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free