Evidence Hub

Analysis of the efficacy of fosfomycin trometamol in preventing biofilm bacterial infection in double-J stents among diabetic patients and the factors associated with infection

Ye JB, Zeng K, Li XB, Yang J, Zhang S, Chen Q

International urology and nephrology, 2026

100 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of fosfomycin trometamol powder (FMT) in preventing biofilm-associated bacterial infections on double-J stents in diabetic patients; to characterize the species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of biofilm-forming bacteria isolated from these devices; and to identify clinical and microbiological risk factors associated with such infections-thereby informing evidence-based strategies for infection prevention in this high-risk population.

METHODS: A total of 100 adult diabetic patients who underwent double-J stent placement at our tertiary care center between June 2024 and June 2025 were prospectively enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either an experimental group or a control group (n = 50 per group). Patients in the experimental group received a single oral dose of 3 g FMT on the day before stent insertion and on postoperative days 7 and 15; those in the control group received a single oral dose of 0.5 g levofloxacin (LFX) tablets on the day before stent insertion and on postoperative days 1 and 2. At the time of stent removal, stent surface specimens were collected for quantitative biofilm-forming bacterial culture, species identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Baseline clinical characteristics, stent-related symptoms, and infection outcomes were systematically recorded. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26.0, with two-sided p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free