Evidence Hub

An ACTH-Producing Neuroendocrine Tumor: Clinical Course of Multidisciplinary Therapy Including Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy – A Case Report

Tomonobu Koizumi, Ai Sato, Kohei Kitajima, Masanori Yamazaki, Sana Kanazawa, T. Notake, Y. Sato, Shota Kobayashi et al.

Case Reports in Oncology, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Clinical experiences of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) producing neuroendocrine tumor (NET) were extremely rare. Case Presentation: A 60-year-old woman with hypertension, lower-extremity edema, hypoalbuminemia, hypokalemia, and multiple hepatic tumors was hospitalized for further examination and treatment. Endocrine testing detected excessive levels of ACTH and cortisol in her blood. Pathohistological examination revealed the hepatic lesions to be ACTH-positive grade 2 NETs (G2). A diagnosis of ectopic ACTH-producing NET was made. The patient was initially treated with the 11-hydroxylase inhibitor, metyrapone, to control hypercortisolemia and the long-acting somatostatin analog, lanreotide. Simultaneously, everolimus was continued for about 1 year. Subsequently, hepatic tumors were surgically resected, leading to successful and rapid normalization of ACTH secretion and resolution of hypercortisolemia. However, the disease relapsed and presented with multiple hepatic masses and increased ACTH 18 months after surgery. As sunitinib and subsequent streptozocin chemotherapy failed to control the disease, PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE was performed. ACTH levels increased after initiation of PRRT, and clinical manifestations, such as pigmentation, hypertension, and hyperglycemia, were remarkable. The patient was treated with antihypertensive and antidiabetic agents, and required an increased dose of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free