Evidence Hub

Impact and Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety in Rheumatoid Arthritis—A Cross-Sectional Study with Self-Reported Questionnaires

C. Ionescu, C. Popescu, C. Codreanu

Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025

209 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to screen for depression and anxiety in a real-life sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to observe whether RA phenotype characteristics and RA disease activity measures are associated with depression and anxiety. Methods: This cross-sectional study from a tertiary rheumatology hospital in Romania screened all patients with diagnosed RA that came for their one month disease follow-up for depression and anxiety using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), self-reported questionnaires. The follow-up captured the date of RA diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, clinical examination, blood sampling, and functional and radiographic assessment. The cut-off for positive screening of depression was a PHQ9 of 10 or more and a HADS-depression (D) of over 10, and the positive cut-off for anxiety was a HADS-anxiety (A) of over 10. Results: According to the medical histories, the prevalence of depression and anxiety in the 209 patients included was 10% and 8.1%, respectively, while the likely depression diagnosis according to PHQ was 34.4% and that according to HADS-D was 14.8%, while the likely anxiety diagnosis using the HADS-A was 32.5%. The subgroup of patients that positively screened for depression using the self-reported questionnaires PHQ9 and HADS-D had significantly higher DAS28, disease activity class, tender joint count, swollen joint count, patient global assessment, and functional…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 209 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free