Evidence Hub

Readiness and Acceptance of Nursing Students Regarding AI-Based Health Care Technology on the Training of Nursing Skills in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study

Kamlah Al-Olaimat, B. Salameh, Rasha Abdulhalim Alqadi, A. Alruwaili, Manal S. A. Hakami, Hanay Huwaydi ALanazi, Tahani Maharem, Fadia Ahmed Abdelkader Reshia

JMIR Nursing, 2025

322 participants · 29 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies across various sectors, including health care, necessitate the need for a comprehensive understanding of their applications. Specifically, the acceptance and readiness of nursing students as future health care professionals to adopt AI-based health care technologies, along with the factors influencing these attitudes, are critical for facilitating the effective integration of AI in health care settings. Objective This study aimed to assess the readiness and acceptance of nursing students regarding the use of AI-based health care technologies in the nursing skills training in Saudi Arabia. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional research design was used. A convenience sampling technique was applied to recruit 322 participants. Data were collected between June and September 2023 using a self-administered questionnaire that included the technology readiness index (TRI) and the technology acceptance scale. Results Approximately 92.2% (297/322) of participants exhibited positive attitudes toward AI, and 74.8% (241/322) demonstrated innovativeness, indicating a generally favorable perception of AI. However, more than half of the students (59% [190/322] and 59.3% [191/322], respectively) reported feelings of discomfort and negative perceptions regarding AI use. Regarding TRI, 69.6% (224/322) of participants showed moderate readiness, while 30.4% (98/322) exhibited a high level of TRI. A…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 322 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free