Evidence Hub

Associations between exposure to digital food marketing and food consumption in adolescence: a cross-sectional study in an emerging country

Gastón Ares, Lucía Antúnez, Florencia Alcaire, Virginia Natero, Vanessa Gugliucci, L. Machín, Carolina De León, Tobias Otterbring

BMC Public Health, 2025

1,542 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

Evidence regarding the link between digital food marketing and eating habits is lacking in the majority world, i.e., the world regions where most people live. This study sought to investigate (i) self-reported exposure to digital food marketing, (ii) associations between such exposure and socio-demographic characteristics, and (iii) associations between exposure and food consumption frequency among adolescents in a Latin American country (Uruguay). A sample of adolescents aged between 11 and 19 years attending 29 public and 10 private high schools (n = 1542) was obtained through a cross-sectional survey using a stratified, two-stage cluster probability-based sampling approach. Participants filled out closed and open-ended questions about exposure to digital food marketing, food consumption frequency, social media usage, and socio-demographic characteristics. The data were analysed through descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regressions. Almost 90% of participants reported having seen a food or beverage advertisement on digital media in the week prior to the survey, with more than 70% of participants recalling advertisements of fast food, soft drinks, and savoury snacks. Age, socio-economic status, or total social media use did not predict exposure frequency of digital food marketing but females (vs. males) reported higher exposure. Exposure to advertisements of fast food or ultra-processed products on social media or websites and total social media use typically…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,542 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free