Comparison of Bubble Size Distributions Inferred from Acoustic, Optical Visualisation, and Laser Diffraction
Abstract
Bubble measurement has been widely discussed in the literature and comparison studies have been widely performed to validate the results obtained for various forms of bubble size inferences. This paper explores three methods used to obtain a bubble size distribution—optical detection, laser diffraction and acoustic inferences—for a bubble cloud. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages due to their intrinsic inference methodology or design flaws due to lack of specificity in measurement. It is clearly demonstrated that seeing bubbles and hearing them are substantially and quantitatively different. The main hypothesis being tested is that for a bubble cloud, acoustic methods are able to detect smaller bubbles compared to the other techniques, as acoustic measurements depend on an intrinsic bubble property, whereas photonics and optical methods are unable to “see” a smaller bubble that is behind a larger bubble. Acoustic methods provide a real-time size distribution for a bubble cloud, whereas for other techniques, appropriate adjustments or compromises must be made in order to arrive at robust data. Acoustic bubble spectrometry consistently records smaller bubbles that were not detected by the other techniques. The difference is largest for acoustic methods and optical methods, with size differences ranging from 5–79% in average bubble size. Differences in size between laser diffraction and optical methods ranged from 5–68%. The differences between laser…
Read the paper
Related studies
- Lathyrism-induced alterations in collagen cross-links influence the mechanical properties of bone material without affecting the mineral
- High-Resolution SPECT-CT/MR Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis in the Vx2 Model
- Severely impaired bone material quality in Chihuahua zebrafish resembles classical dominant human osteogenesis imperfecta
- Small-animal SPECT and SPECT/CT: application in cardiovascular research
- Intravital imaging of osteocytes in mouse calvaria using third harmonic generation microscopy
- Techniques and Evaluation From a Cross-Platform Imaging Comparison of Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters in an In Vivo Rodent Fibroadenoma Model
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.