Evidence Hub

A 6- to 9-months oral regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: a randomized open-label noninferiority trial in China

Sun F, Li Y, Zhang Y, Cai C, Chen Y, Yi H, Wu Q, Qian Y et al.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2026

312 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objectives: Despite advancements in shorter, oral regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis, more options are needed to extent patient benefits. We conducted a trial to evaluate the noninferiority of an all-oral regimen compared with the injectable-containing regimen.

Methods: In an open-label, randomized noninferiority trial in China, participants with rifampicin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis were assigned 1:1 to a 6- to 9-month all-oral regimen (levofloxacin, linezolid, cycloserine, clofazimine and/or pyrazinamide) and a 9-month injectable-containing control regimen. The primary outcome was a favourable outcome at 84 weeks after treatment initiation, defined by two consecutive, negative cultures with no previous unfavourable outcome, using a noninferiority margin of 10%.

Results: Between 2 June 2020, and 1 December 2021, 660 participants were enrolled and 354 underwent randomization. A total of 312 and 260 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat and the per-protocol analysis, respectively. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 76.1% of participants in the oral group and 63.7% of those in the control group had a favourable outcome at 84 weeks (difference, 12.4%; 95% CI, 2.4-22.5%; noninferiority p < 0.0001). In the per-protocol analysis, 84.4% of participants in the oral group and 73.5% of participants in the control group had a favourable outcome (difference, 10.9%; 95% CI, 1.1-20.7%; noninferiority p < 0.0001). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 312 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free