Commentary: an eye on PET quantification
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) is generally considered to be a quantitative imaging modality, allowing assessment of regional differences in radiotracer accumulation and the derivation of quantitative physiological information. Due to the increasing complexity of PET technology, the quantitative accuracy of PET images has to be continually reassessed if PET is to maintain its quantitative reputation. In this commentary, we discuss the results from a recent inter-scanner study in which the quantitative outcome measures from human studies were compared for three different radiotracers. The approach is a useful complement to standard phantom tests such as those prescribed by NEMA, but the resulting data are more difficult to interpret.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Metabolic Syndrome: Updates on Pathophysiology and Management in 2021
- Environmental pollutants as risk factors for neurodegenerative disorders: Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases
- Antioxidants, inflammation and cardiovascular disease
- Application of Metabolomics in Alzheimer’s Disease
- Nutritional Importance of Carotenoids and Their Effect on Liver Health: A Review
- Nutritional essentiality of sulfur in health and disease
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.