Evidence Hub

Efficacy of High-Dose Versus Conventional-Dose Methylprednisolone in Reducing the Risk of Chronic Lung Disease in Chinese Children With Severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia: A Retrospective Study

Su Y, Yu Y, Zhang L, Tang Y, Li M, Chen C, Xu S, Wang Y et al.

Pediatric pulmonology, 2026

82 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of high-dose versus conventional-dose methylprednisolone therapy and the prevalence of chronic lung disease (CLD) at the 6-month follow-up in Chinese children with severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (SMPP).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 82 children with SMPP admitted from January 2018 to January 2024. Patients were categorized into high-dose and conventional-dose groups based on initial glucocorticoid dosage. Clinical data, laboratory tests, chest imaging, and bronchoscopy findings were reviewed to compare pulmonary conditions and therapeutic efficacy. The prevalence of CLD, oxygen saturation levels, and pulmonary function were assessed at the 6-month follow-up.

Results: The main clinical features of SMPP included persistent high fever, cough, excessive inflammation (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, procalcitonin, interleukin-6, lactate dehydrogenase, serum ferritin, and D-Dimer), as well as severe pulmonary involvement, including consolidation, pleural effusion, and lung necrosis on computed tomography, and mucus plugging on bronchoscopy. Disease severity was comparable between groups, but the high-dose group exhibited a shorter fever duration (9.8 vs. 16.1 days), faster defervescence after corticosteroid treatment (1.0 vs. 7.0 days), and reduced hospitalization (13.4 vs. 18.4 days) (all p < 0.001). At the 6-month follow-up, the high-dose group had a significantly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 82 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free