Evidence Hub

The effect of psychological intervention combined with standard pharmacological therapy in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS): A randomized controlled trial

Lin X, Pan XB, Guo BZ, Lee SP

Medicine, 2025

84 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) often coexists with anxiety and depression. This study assessed whether adding psychological intervention (PI) to standard pharmacotherapy improves patient outcomes.

Methods: One hundred sixty eight adult patients diagnosed with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) were recruited for this study. They were randomly divided into control and PI groups. All patients in both groups received a 30-day standard prostatitis pharmacotherapy regimen with levofloxacin and tamsulosin. Additionally, the 84 patients in the PI group received PIs, unlike those in the control group. The self-rating depression scale and self-rating anxiety scale were employed to assess the psychological symptoms before and 3 months after the therapeutic treatments.

Results: Following treatment, the PI group exhibited significantly better recovery from symptoms of anxiety, depression, and prostatitis compared to the control group. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that patients with longer disease durations had higher self-rating anxiety scale, self-rating depression scale, and National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index Scale scores. The study demonstrated that PI has positive early effects on patients with CP/CPPS. However, its efficacy decreases as the duration of the disease progresses.

Conclusion: The combination of PI and conventional antibiotics is effective for CP/CPPS patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 84 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free