Evidence Hub

Risk stratification and source classification in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: high mortality linked to mrsa, biomarkers, and treatment efficacy

Feng Q, Ha X, Song Y

Frontiers in immunology, 2026

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) carries a high mortality rate. This study aims to develop a source-specific classification framework to guide management and improve outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 321 S. aureus bloodstream infection patients (2012-2025), using ROC analysis, survival curves, and SPSS to evaluate 12-month in-hospital mortality and its predictors.

Results: Among 3,516 bloodstream infections, 321 episodes of S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) were identified (9.12%). The median time to positivity was 14 hours. The most common infection sources were the lungs (26.8%), catheter-related infections (24.3%), and skin/soft tissue infections (23.4%). Hemodialysis was the predominant comorbidity (21.2%). Biomarker analysis showed high diagnostic accuracy for PCT (AUC 0.957), WBC (AUC 1.000), and neutrophil percentage (AUC 0.913). MRSA accounted for 38% of isolates. Both MRSA and MSSA exhibited >50% resistance to penicillin, erythromycin, and clindamycin, but none to linezolid, vancomycin, or tigecycline. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 30.2%, significantly higher in MRSA (38%) than in MSSA (26%) (p=0.048). Notably, 36.1% of deaths occurred within 24 hours, and 58.7% within 7 days. The 10-day survival rate was lower in MRSA (0.609 vs. 0.759, p=0.029). Healthcare-associated infections (58%) showed no significant association with MRSA prevalence after Bonferroni correction. Independent mortality predictors included qSOFA score ≥2 (OR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free