Evidence Hub

Successful dual therapy of aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam for multidrug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in a preterm neonate: A life-saving approach

Alghamdi AO, Algethami AS, Aljuaeed MS, Alkhammash FM, Almalki FM, Alharthi SA, Aljaed NM, Abosabie SA et al.

The Journal of international medical research, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogen associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in immunocompromised patients. Its resistance mechanisms include aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, qnrB-like quinolone resistance genes, multidrug efflux pumps, and β-lactamases (L1 and L2). With the increasing incidence of S. maltophilia infections, effective treatment strategies are urgently needed to combat its growing resistance. We present the case of a preterm male neonate, born at 30 weeks of gestation, who developed respiratory distress requiring mechanical ventilation. Empiric antibiotics were initiated but failed to prevent clinical deterioration. Respiratory cultures confirmed that multidrug-resistant S. maltophilia is resistant to standard therapies, necessitating a novel dual regimen of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam. This combination therapy was administered for 14 days, leading to microbiological clearance and clinical improvement, allowing successful extubation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam successfully treating multidrug-resistant S. maltophilia infection in a preterm infant. This case underscores the potential of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam as a viable therapeutic option for multidrug-resistant S. maltophilia infections in neonates. Further studies are warranted to validate its safety and efficacy in similar cases.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free