Evidence Hub

Effects of antiretrovirals on major adverse cardiovascular events in the REPRIEVE trial: a longitudinal cohort analysis

Fichtenbaum CJ, Malvestutto CD, Watanabe MG, Davies Smith E, Ribaudo HJ, McCallum S, Fitch KV, Currier JS et al.

The lancet. HIV, 2025

7,769 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

Background: In the REPRIEVE trial of statin therapy in people with HIV, pitavastatin reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among those with low-to-moderate risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to investigate associations between former and current use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) on entry into the REPRIEVE trial and the development of MACE.

Methods: This longitudinal cohort analysis was a prespecified secondary analysis of the REPRIEVE trial, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 randomised trial conducted at 137 sites in 12 countries. REPRIEVE enrolled people with HIV aged 40-75 years, currently on ART, with a CD4 count of more than 100 cells per μL and low-to-moderate CVD risk, and randomly assigned them to receive pitavastatin or placebo. For this secondary analysis, participants' history of ART use, including lifetime exposure to selected agents, was collected at baseline. The primary outcome of interest was time-to-first MACE. Stratified Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative hazards of MACE associated with ART exposures. Effects of no previous exposure, former exposure, and current exposure to ART at entry to the study were compared using models unadjusted and adjusted for entry risk factors and ART regimen at entry. All analyses were conducted in the intention-to-treat population. The REPRIEVE trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02344290, and is complete.

Findings: Between March 26,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 7,769 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free